Or Dick Head for short.
Ok, so I was reading in Forbes magazine (not because I read it, because I was taking a massive shit on the toilet and it was all I had to pass the time) and there was an article about Blogs. The article told how they were desctructive, and specifically told of a man that had some special type of chocolate that was going to be bought by Nestle company. This was a multi-million dollar deal. Suddenly, Nestle pulls out, causes this guys stock to crash, and bassically ruined the company. Why? Because some guy claiming to be a British journalist (but giving no proof, using a free email address, and running a Yahoo *free* Blog) claimed there was somethign wrong with the chocolate. Now, at first I thought "wow, sucks for the little business man, I'd find that guy, fly to Britain, and crack some skulls". Then I put some ACTUAL thought into it, and came up with this conclusion.
Theres no fucking way.
Nestle is a multi-milllion (I'd even go as far to say in the billions, who doesnt eat some of their stuff?) coporation ready to down a few million on this guys recipie. They spent months and lots of money on R&D and because some guy who gave no proof claimed that it had a flaw? Bullshit. My point? Blogs arent destructive, human stupidity is. But my issue is that the magazine had a personal section where people called for the silencing of the blogs, or the limitation of them. And I couldnt agree more, I mean, why should people think they have the right to say whatever they want, hell it might catch on and be added to constitution and they might call it something crazy like "Freedom of Speech". Just remember people, words dont hurt, never forget that, always speak your mind and say what you want.